The Federal Reserve races against time...
Since its first halting step off the zero bound in December 2015, the Fed has lifted the fed funds rate to a “so far so good” 1.25%.
The finish line is 3.5%.
Why 3.5%?
Jim Rickards:
Historically, it takes 300–400 basis points of rate cuts (3–4%) to steer the U.S. economy out of recession. Fed policy today can be understood as a desperate race to get the fed funds rate to 3.5% before the next recession hits without actually causing a recession in the process.
Assuming the usual 0.25% bump per hike, that means nine additional rate hikes before the business is done.
At current rates, the Fed crosses the 3.5% finish line by the end of 2019.
But will recession arrive first?
Under normal circumstances the Fed raises interest rates to douse inflationary brush fires.
But inflation was running at only 0.65% in December 2015 when the Fed began its rate hike cycle.
And since nicking 2.80% this February, the consumer price index (CPI) has plummeted to a sparkless 1.73% at last reading (July).
After peaking at 2.26% in January, core CPI — CPI minus the more variable food and gas components — has also dimmed to a faint 1.70%.
Only a supreme effort of the imagination — likely a madman’s or a central banker’s imagination — could construe the foregoing as “inflation.”
Eric Basmajian, independent equity analyst, formerly of Morgan Stanley:
The Fed has constantly cited 2% inflation as its target for increasing interest rates. However, it is very clear that inflation is not only below 2% on headline CPI and core CPI but is sharply moving in the wrong direction.
Meantime, yield on the bellwether 10-year Treasury note has fallen to 2.13% — its lowest handle since Nov. 9.
The bond market see no inflation… and hears no inflation.
Nor does it spot the thrusting green shoots of growth — unlike the Fed-drunk stock market.
Jim again:
The 10-year Treasury bond yield has fallen from 2.4% in mid-May to 2.13% today. Falling yields suggest weakening growth or possibly recession ahead...
Here we have a sketch of slackened growth and falling prices… of an economy in danger of slipping into recession.
We thus find Janet Yellen hung on the hooks of a giant dilemma.
Any more tightening could easily tip the economy into recession — if the Fed’s previous tightening hasn’t already.
Any more tightening could easily tip the economy into recession — if the Fed’s previous tightening hasn’t already.
Consider that 10 of the last 13 tightening cycles have ended in recession.
But how can the Fed stock up for recession if it can’t get past 1.25%?
Its 3.5% goal seems a pie well and truly in the sky.
Meantime, the U.S. economy enters its 99th consecutive month without a recession — the third-longest stretch in history.
How long can Lady Fortune smile?
Caped anti-cash crusader Ken Rogoff recently scribbled a paper urging central banks to start preparing for the next recession now.
How?
By digging the foundations of negative interest rates:
… undertaking institutional changes that clear the way for effective negative interest rate policy is likely to be the cleanest approach to restoring the efficacy of monetary policy at the zero bound…
Enabling effective negative rate policy is also much cleaner and more elegant than the second-best policy of raising inflation targets.
Translation: Negative interest rates are the royal road to recovery. But they’re not possible as long as people can withdraw their cash from banks.
Start withdrawing cash from circulation, at least large bills (Rogoff graciously allows the use of smaller bills to facilitate penny-ante purchases).
Bitter medicine, by our lights. No — wrong medicine.
But it is nonetheless the medicine on offer.
Nineteen European countries already feature negative interest rates… as does Japan.
So… when the inevitable recession arrives, will America be next?
Below, Jim Rickards shows you why the answer could be yes. Read on for the full story.
Regards,
Brian Maher
Managing editor, The Daily Reckoning
www.fotavgeia.blogspot.com
Since its first halting step off the zero bound in December 2015, the Fed has lifted the fed funds rate to a “so far so good” 1.25%.
The finish line is 3.5%.
Why 3.5%?
Jim Rickards:
Historically, it takes 300–400 basis points of rate cuts (3–4%) to steer the U.S. economy out of recession. Fed policy today can be understood as a desperate race to get the fed funds rate to 3.5% before the next recession hits without actually causing a recession in the process.
Assuming the usual 0.25% bump per hike, that means nine additional rate hikes before the business is done.
At current rates, the Fed crosses the 3.5% finish line by the end of 2019.
But will recession arrive first?
Under normal circumstances the Fed raises interest rates to douse inflationary brush fires.
But inflation was running at only 0.65% in December 2015 when the Fed began its rate hike cycle.
And since nicking 2.80% this February, the consumer price index (CPI) has plummeted to a sparkless 1.73% at last reading (July).
After peaking at 2.26% in January, core CPI — CPI minus the more variable food and gas components — has also dimmed to a faint 1.70%.
Only a supreme effort of the imagination — likely a madman’s or a central banker’s imagination — could construe the foregoing as “inflation.”
Eric Basmajian, independent equity analyst, formerly of Morgan Stanley:
The Fed has constantly cited 2% inflation as its target for increasing interest rates. However, it is very clear that inflation is not only below 2% on headline CPI and core CPI but is sharply moving in the wrong direction.
Meantime, yield on the bellwether 10-year Treasury note has fallen to 2.13% — its lowest handle since Nov. 9.
The bond market see no inflation… and hears no inflation.
Nor does it spot the thrusting green shoots of growth — unlike the Fed-drunk stock market.
Jim again:
The 10-year Treasury bond yield has fallen from 2.4% in mid-May to 2.13% today. Falling yields suggest weakening growth or possibly recession ahead...
Here we have a sketch of slackened growth and falling prices… of an economy in danger of slipping into recession.
We thus find Janet Yellen hung on the hooks of a giant dilemma.
Any more tightening could easily tip the economy into recession — if the Fed’s previous tightening hasn’t already.
Any more tightening could easily tip the economy into recession — if the Fed’s previous tightening hasn’t already.
Consider that 10 of the last 13 tightening cycles have ended in recession.
But how can the Fed stock up for recession if it can’t get past 1.25%?
Its 3.5% goal seems a pie well and truly in the sky.
Meantime, the U.S. economy enters its 99th consecutive month without a recession — the third-longest stretch in history.
How long can Lady Fortune smile?
Caped anti-cash crusader Ken Rogoff recently scribbled a paper urging central banks to start preparing for the next recession now.
How?
By digging the foundations of negative interest rates:
… undertaking institutional changes that clear the way for effective negative interest rate policy is likely to be the cleanest approach to restoring the efficacy of monetary policy at the zero bound…
Enabling effective negative rate policy is also much cleaner and more elegant than the second-best policy of raising inflation targets.
Translation: Negative interest rates are the royal road to recovery. But they’re not possible as long as people can withdraw their cash from banks.
Start withdrawing cash from circulation, at least large bills (Rogoff graciously allows the use of smaller bills to facilitate penny-ante purchases).
Bitter medicine, by our lights. No — wrong medicine.
But it is nonetheless the medicine on offer.
Nineteen European countries already feature negative interest rates… as does Japan.
So… when the inevitable recession arrives, will America be next?
Below, Jim Rickards shows you why the answer could be yes. Read on for the full story.
Regards,
Brian Maher
Managing editor, The Daily Reckoning
www.fotavgeia.blogspot.com
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου